Re: intercepting WAL writes
От | Mike |
---|---|
Тема | Re: intercepting WAL writes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 009001c8c12d$efd67ec0$cf837c40$@com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: intercepting WAL writes ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: intercepting WAL writes
Re: intercepting WAL writes |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Mike <mike@fonolo.com> wrote: >> When you say a bit of decoding, is that because the data written to the logs >> is after the query parser/planner? Or because it's written in several >> chunks? Or? > >Because that's the actual recovery record. There is no SQL text, just >the WAL record type (XLOG_HEAP_INSERT, XLOG_HEAP_UPDATE, >XLOG_XACT_COMMIT, ...) and the data as it relates to that operation. Oh- right- that makes sense. I installed and started looking at the source code for xlogviewer and xlogdump; seems like a reasonable place to start. Thanks for your help, Mike
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: