>>
>>I believe that it is ideal for Postgres to be computationally complete in that one *could* use it to implement a
completeapplication. That isn't to say one should do this as a matter of course, good to use appropriate tools for a
>>job,but that it should at least be possible if one wanted to. -- Darren Duncan
So who wants to fund the effort to create the necessary infrastructure to display a programmer-defined user interface
screen(think of the "Forms" module in Microsoft Access)? Or are you expecting the end-user to open up PgAdmin and type
"SELECThello_world();". I would argue that because PostgreSQL is able to talk with many languages that can create
these"Forms" (or even - through extensions - a web-browser) that such functionality is NOT DESIREABLE and thus
PostgreSQLwould not ideally be "computationally complete" by that definition.
David J.