RE: Understanding was terminated by signal 9: Killed
От | Michel SALAIS |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Understanding was terminated by signal 9: Killed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 006701d7c5f0$e4ddc100$ae994300$@msym.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Understanding was terminated by signal 9: Killed (John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Understanding was terminated by signal 9: Killed
Re: Understanding was terminated by signal 9: Killed Re: Understanding was terminated by signal 9: Killed |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Be careful! I am not sure but upgrade for a larger instance can't be temporary. I think you can't downgrade to the original instance class thereafter... -- Michel SALAIS -----Message d'origine----- De : John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com> Envoyé : mercredi 20 octobre 2021 01:12 À : Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Cc : Wells Oliver <wells.oliver@gmail.com>; pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org> Objet : Re: Understanding was terminated by signal 9: Killed You could always change the size of the RDS instance to something larger than what it currently is running, even just temporarily. Sent from my iPad > On Oct 19, 2021, at 6:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Wells Oliver <wells.oliver@gmail.com> writes: >> In an RDS instance with 16GB RAM, I ran a long query which started by >> setting temp_buffers to 16GB, so I think I plum ran out of memory, >> but can anyone point me in a different direction if the following log >> messages indicate something else is awry? > > Yeah, this: > >> 2021-10-19 21:10:37 UTC::@:[24752]:LOG: server process (PID 25813) >> was terminated by signal 9: Killed > > almost certainly indicates the Linux OOM killer at work. If you were > running your own system I'd point you to [1], but I doubt that RDS > lets you put your hands on the relevant knobs. > > regards, tom lane > > [1] > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/kernel-resources.html#LINUX-ME > MORY-OVERCOMMIT > >
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: