Re: Request for qualified column names
От | Reggie Burnett |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Request for qualified column names |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 006001c2c71c$1a0ce6a0$c600a8c0@endeavor обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Request for qualified column names (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Could someone point me to this standard? Is that the standard for SQL syntax? I wasn't aware there was a standard for RDBMS functionality. I always assumed the features provided by the RDBMS were up to the implementers. Reggie > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net] > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:59 PM > To: Bruce Momjian > Cc: Tom Lane; Reggie Burnett; 'Dave Cramer'; 'PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing > List' > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for qualified column names > > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > My idea on this after chat with Dave was to add a GUC option that puts > > the schema.table.column name as the default column label, rather than > > just the column name. > > Can someone explain why this is needed at all? There is a reason why the > SQL standard does not provide for this information: it's not well defined. > Are you trying to make up a poor substitute for updatable views? > > -- > Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: