Re: "make report"
От | Igor Kovalenko |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "make report" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 006001c1ebbc$8f9f8620$22c30191@comm.mot.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "make report" (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: "make report"
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
It depends. QNX4 may be used with GCC, in which case it does have long long. I am not sure if that combination will play along with Postgres, but it should not be assumed impossible. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net> To: "Thomas Lockhart" <lockhart@fourpalms.org> Cc: "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:14 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "make report" > Thomas Lockhart writes: > > > Right. The two areas which come to mind are integer availability and the > > timezone support (as you might know we support *three* different time > > zone models). At the moment, none of the developers know the features > > supported on the platforms we claim to support. Which platforms do not > > have int8 support still? > > "Still" is the wrong word. There used to be platforms with certain areas > of trouble, and those platforms don't go away. > > But since you asked: QNX 4 and SCO OpenServer are known to lack 8 byte > integers. > > > Which do not have time zone interfaces fitting > > into the two "zonefull" styles? I'd like to know, but istm that the > > people *with* the platforms could do this much more easily than those > > without. What am I missing here?? > > I don't think polling users this way will yield reliable results. If you > really want to find out, break something and see if someone complains. > > -- > Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: