Re: pg_dump.options.diff
От | Serguei Mokhov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump.options.diff |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 005701c2b2b1$8e923fe0$0301a8c0@gunnymede.lan обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_dump.options.diff ("Serguei Mokhov" <mokhov@cs.concordia.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump.options.diff
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Sent: January 02, 2003 3:20 PM > > #if defined(HAVE_GETOPT_LONG) > > #define xo(long,short,desc) printf("%s %s\n", long, desc) > > #else > > #define xo(long,short,desc) printf("%s %s\n", short, desc) > > #endif > > > seems relatively generic, so it could be used by more than one tool. > > But there's no good place to put it. I'd say just stick it into each > tool; it's no worse than repeating the existence of a "usage()" > subroutine in each tool. It ended up being in dumputils.h Attached a patch for pg_dump(all) and pg_restore eliminating dupes in option descriptions as per above xo "technology". Please review and apply if there are no too many objections. thank you, -s
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: