Re: ToDo List Item - System Table Index Clustering
От | Simone Aiken |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ToDo List Item - System Table Index Clustering |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 005601cbb76a$596133f0$0c239bd0$@quietlyCompetent.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ToDo List Item - System Table Index Clustering (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ToDo List Item - System Table Index Clustering
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----Original Message----- From: Robert Haas [mailto:robertmhaas@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 2:53 PM To: Simone Aiken Cc: Alvaro Herrera; pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ToDo List Item - System Table Index Clustering >Sure - my point is just that we usually have as a criteria for any >performance related patch that it actually does improve performance. Sorry wasn't arguing your point. Conceding it actually. =) I wasn't explaining why I chose it anyway to contest your statements, but as an invitation for you to point me towards something more useful that fit what I was looking for in a task. > > Uh... I don't know what this means. > Pages like this one have column comments for the system tables: http://www.psql.it/manuale/8.3/catalog-pg-attribute.html But in my database when I look for comments they aren't there: qcc=> \d+ pg_attribute Table "pg_catalog.pg_attribute" Column | Type | Modifiers | Description ---------------+----------+-----------+-------------attrelid | oid | not null |attname | name | notnull |atttypid | oid | not null |attstattarget | integer | not null |attlen | smallint | not null |attnum | smallint | not null |attndims | integer | not null |attcacheoff | integer | not null |atttypmod | integer | not null |attbyval | boolean | not null |attstorage | "char" | not null |attalign | "char" | not null |attnotnull | boolean | not null |atthasdef | boolean | not null |attisdropped | boolean | not null |attislocal | boolean | not null |attinhcount | integer | not null | So I have to fire up a web browser and start googling to learn about the columns. Putting them in pg_description would be more handy, no? -Simone Aiken
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: