Re: Recomended FS
От | Ben-Nes Michael |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Recomended FS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 004f01c396f9$c339e400$0500a8c0@canaan.co.il обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Recomended FS ("Ben-Nes Michael" <miki@canaan.co.il>) |
Ответы |
Re: Recomended FS
|
Список | pgsql-general |
I'm not a HD specialist but I know scsi can handle load much better the IDE. I read a benchmark lately ( don't really remember where ) checking SATA against U160, the result show that SATA give better performance at start. but later on the SCSI take it while HD cpu load is 30% and the SATA is 100% load for the same task. So I see its kinda obvious for me, if its a server serve lots of files and the HD will work against lots of users ill go for the SCSI. For a workstation or backup server ill go for IDE. But still the greatest question is what FS to put on ? I heard Reiesref can handle small files very quickly. -------------------------- Canaan Surfing Ltd. Internet Service Providers Ben-Nes Michael - Manager Tel: 972-4-6991122 Fax: 972-4-6990098 http://www.canaan.net.il -------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Childs" <blue.dragon@blueyonder.co.uk> To: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in> Cc: "Ben-Nes Michael" <miki@canaan.co.il>; "postgresql" <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 11:51 AM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Recomended FS > > > On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > > > > A fast HD with a good RAID controller. Subject to budget, SCSI are beter buy > > than IDE. So does hardware SCSI RAID. > > > I hate asking this again. But WHY? > > What SCSI gain in spinning at 15000RPM and larger buffers. They > lose in Space, and a slower bus. I would like to see some profe. Sorry. > > IDE Hard Disk 40Gb 7200RPM = 133Mbs = 50UKP > SCSI Hard Disk 36Gb 10000RPM = 160Mbs = 110UKP > > Is that extra 27Mbs worth another IDE Disk. and while you can get > bigger faster SCSI disks prices go through the roof. Its no longer RAID > but RAED (Redundant Array of Expensive Disks) > > My advise not that I've got any proof is that the money is better > spent on a good disk controller and many disks than on each disk. > > In short if you have money to burn then by all means get SCSI but > most people are better of spending > > $200 Disk Controller $200 Disk Controller > $100 40Gb Disks Than $200 40Gb Disk > > Prices only approx. > > Peter Childs >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: