Re: How do BEGIN/COMMIT/ABORT operate in a nested SPI query?
От | David Bennett |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How do BEGIN/COMMIT/ABORT operate in a nested SPI query? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 004301d199ce$5b586f10$12094d30$@pfxcorp.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How do BEGIN/COMMIT/ABORT operate in a nested SPI query? (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: How do BEGIN/COMMIT/ABORT operate in a nested SPI
query?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> From: Albe Laurenz [mailto:laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at] > > > I am attempting to create a new language implementation. The language > > is Andl (andl.org), so the handler is plandl. > > This is a question about executing SPI queries from inside plandl. > > > > The documentation makes it clear that SPI allows nested queries; that > > in some instances it will be necessary to call SPI_push() and > > SPI_pop(), but in others this will be handled automatically. Se > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/interactive/spi-spi-push.html. > > > > It is an important design feature of plandl to allow nested queries. > > > > My question is: where are the transaction boundaries if the > > inner/outer query do or do not contain BEGIN/ABORT/COMMIT? Do they > > nest, or does an inner COMMIT finish a transaction started by an outer > BEGIN, or is it ignored? > > You cannot have BEGIN or COMMIT inside a function. Are you sure you meant it like that? I already have BEGIN/COMMIT inside a function and it works perfectly. If it did not,then it would be impossible to use BEGIN/COMMIT in any language handler, since every call to a language handler is acall to a function. Did you mean 'inside a nested function'? Or something else? Regards David M Bennett FACS Andl - A New Database Language - andl.org
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: