Re: build of 7.2.1 on SCO Openserver and Unixware 7.1.1

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: "Nicolas Bazin" <nbazin@ingenico.com.au>; "PostgreSQL-development"
<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:30 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] build of 7.2.1 on SCO Openserver and Unixware 7.1.1


> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Yes, the patch replaces pow(8,*) with a lookup table of 4 8^X values.
> > So SCO provides a library you can't link to?  Or you can't mix *.so
> > libraries and static *.a libraries?  I am inclined ot add this patch to
> > the doc/FAQ_SCO file.  We really try to avoid major code uglyness to
> > work around operating system things that should work on their own.
>
> Actually, the existing coding in odbc is just plain stupid: why are we
> using a transcendental function call to emulate an integer shift?
> Even the table-based implementation that Nicolas proposed is doing it
> the hard way.  Try converting, eg,
>
> for (i = 1; i <= 3; i++)
> y += (s[i] - 48) * (int) pow(8, 3 - i);
>
> to
>
> for (i = 1; i <= 3; i++)
> y += (s[i] - '0') << (3 * (3 - i));
>
> and you can get the patch accepted just on efficiency and readability
> grounds, never mind whether it avoids SCO library breakage.
>
> >> The TCL stuff is because Caldera distribution of TCL is compiled with
their
> >> compiler. If you happen to use another compiler on your platform (gcc)
it
> >> doesn't work anymore. Caldera compiler has -belf -Kpic options which
are
> >> fully incompatible with gcc. That's why I though best to leave the TCL
> >> packages been compiled with the compiler used for postgresql.
>
> We've been around on this a couple of times now; the current theory is
> that we should stop using the TCL-supplied switches altogether.  There
> is a patch in the works to change libpgtcl and pltcl to be built the
> same way we build everything else in the distribution.
Perls modules have the same problems. Is there a patch also ?

>
> regards, tom lane
>
>