Re: replication_timeout not effective
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: replication_timeout not effective |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 003e01ce35a8$fced21a0$f6c764e0$@kapila@huawei.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | replication_timeout not effective (Dang Minh Huong <kakalot49@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 9:35 AM Dang Minh Huong wrote: > Hi, > I'm wondering if this is a bug of PostgreSQL. > PostgreSQL's show that replication_timeout parameter can "Terminate = replication connections that are inactive longer than the specified = number of milliseconds". But in my environment the sender process > is = hang up (in several tens of minunites) if i turn off (by power off) = Standby PC while pg_basebackup is excuting. > Is this correct? > As my debug, sender process is terminated when recieve SIGPIPE process = but it come too slow (about 30minutes after standby PC was down).=20 For such scenario's, new parameter wal_sender_timeout has been = introduced in 9.3. Refer below: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/runtime-config-replication.ht= ml#RUNTIME-CONFIG-REPLICATION-SENDER I am not sure how to get rid of this problem in 9.1.9 With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: