Re: [GENERAL] PGSQL/JDBC & browser compatibility
От | Tim Perdue |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] PGSQL/JDBC & browser compatibility |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 003901be8f88$63883e30$0b8c5aa5@timnt.weather.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-general |
Because of this, no one ever deploys java on the client-side, unless they have a tight control over what browser people are using. I work at a fortune 500 company on a team that is deploying java in a browser and we have dictated netscape 4.08 and IE 4.01 as the required browsers. You're probably better off deploying java on the server-side and using something like PHP or java servlets as the interface. Tim Perdue PHPBuilder.com / GotoCity.com / Geocrawler.com -----Original Message----- From: Bob VonMoss <bvonmoss@bigfoot.com> To: PostGreSQL General List <pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org> Date: Sunday, April 25, 1999 8:08 PM Subject: [GENERAL] PGSQL/JDBC & browser compatibility >I'm developing a java applet with JDBC using the Postgresql driver. >Apparently, the only browsers that are compatible with my java code >compiled under Sun JDK 1.1.X is Netscape Communicator 4.5 and the Sun >JDK 1.1.X appletviewer. MSIE 5.0 gives me the message "no suitable >driver" when I try to connect to pgsql. There are all kinds of error >messages, not only with Netscape 3.0, which of course does not support >the java.sql package, but also Netscape Communicator 4.0.x > >Is anyone using pgsql with MSIE? Is there a MS java compiler? > >How have others dealt with JDBC and the limited browser selection? One >solution is to not do JDBC in the front end applet and only in the back >end which is not used in any browser. This defeats a lot of the purpose >in using JDBC in the first place. Of course, JDBC is nice from a >database programming point of view, but sucks because it lacks security >and won't go through firewalls. > >-- >Bob VonMoss >mailto:bvonmoss@bigfoot.com >from Chicago, IL > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: