Re: feeding big script to psql
От | Havasvölgyi Ottó |
---|---|
Тема | Re: feeding big script to psql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 003801c59743$fc5f8a90$8000a8c0@OTTO обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Tool for database design documentation? ("Jon Christian Ottersen" <jco@kvikkpass.no>) |
Ответы |
Re: feeding big script to psql
Re: feeding big script to psql |
Список | pgsql-general |
Tom, Thanks for the suggestion. I have just applied both switch , -f (I have applied this in the previous case too) and -n, but it becomes slow again. At the beginning it reads about 300 KB a second, and when it has read 1.5 MB, it reads only about 10 KB a second, it slows down gradually. Maybe others should also try this scenario. Can I help anything? Best Regards, Otto ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: "Havasvölgyi Ottó" <h.otto@freemail.hu> Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 3:54 AM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] feeding big script to psql > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Havasv=F6lgyi_Ott=F3?= <h.otto@freemail.hu> writes: >> I know it would be faster with COPY, but this is extremly slow, and the >> bottleneck is psql. >> What is the problem? > > Hmm, does the Windows port have readline support, and if so does adding > the "-n" switch to the psql invocation fix the problem? Or you could > try feeding the script with -f switch or \i rather than "psql <script". > Readline adds a fair amount of overhead, which is completely invisible > at human typing speeds but can be annoying when reading scripts. > > regards, tom lane > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: