Re: Sleep functions
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sleep functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 002f01c5a6a8$1306a290$6a01a8c0@valehousing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Sleep functions (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----Original Message----- From: "Michael Fuhr"<mike@fuhr.org> Sent: 21/08/05 23:53:50 To: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org"<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> Subject: [HACKERS] Sleep functions > What do people think of exposing > pg_usleep() to the user? Good idea - I've done so myself in the past for testing. Regards, Dave -----Unmodified Original Message----- What do people think of exposing pg_usleep() to the user? It's sometimes useful to have a server-side sleep function, and people do ask about it occasionally (e.g., Don Drake today in pgsql-admin). It's easy enough to do in PL/Perl, PL/Tcl, etc., but since the backend already has pg_usleep(), is there any reason not to expose it? I'd propose both sleep() and usleep() functions. -- Michael Fuhr ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypesdo not match
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: