Re: [INTERFACES] Large objects, why not use the filesystem?
От | Gregory W Burnham |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] Large objects, why not use the filesystem? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 002901be4de9$389a2f20$8d0835d1@bconnected.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
----- Original Message ----- From: Herouth Maoz <herouth@oumail.openu.ac.il> To: Gregory W Burnham <gburnham@sfu.ca> Cc: <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org> Sent: Monday, February 01, 1999 5:47 AM Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Large objects, why not use the filesystem? >At 15:28 +0200 on 01/02/1999, Gregory W Burnham wrote: > > >> Right, but I'm storing html and gif in my blobs and just >> writing them out to stdout. Why shouldn't I just store >> the file names and put the files right on the server? > >No reason at all. If it works for your application, then Buy Nike... oops, >I meant "Just Do It". There are pros and cons for Blobs. If the pros don't >hold for you, don't use Blobs. Right, obviously. I'd just always assumed that lo_s were more efficient. Now one of my beliefs is shot and I'm crushed. But don't worry, I'll be ok. >> To quote a friend of mine, "Efficiency is an issue only when >> inefficiency is a problem." But still, you want to be as >> efficient as possible, right? In retrospec, it would have >> been more efficient to store all four digits of the year, right? > >Actually, it would simply have postponed the problem to a later date... We should be using 5 digits, right? Gregory W Burnham Software Engineer Excite Labs Faculty Of Education Simon Fraser University Vancouver, BC, V5A 1S6 604 291 3615 (ph) 604 291 5679 (fx)
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: