Re: ecpg weird behavior

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Meskes" <meskes@postgresql.org>
To: "Nicolas Bazin" <nbazin@ingenico.com.au>
Cc: <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ecpg weird behavior


> On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 03:34:56PM +1100, Nicolas Bazin wrote:
> > EXEC SQL type mytype is .... does not need a typedef after.
> 
> This works mostly but still has some SQL syntax in it:
> typedef str reference c
> 
> I hope to find all this syntax problems.
> 
> > I still have a problem when the grammar is parsed by bison. I get the
> > following message:
> > conflicts: 12 shift/reduce
> 
> I will take care of this although I haven't yet found the reason.
> 
Thanks. Can you keep me updated when you commit the modifications?

> Michael
> 
> -- 
> Michael Meskes
> Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
> Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
> Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
>