Re: questions about disk configurations
От | Keith Bottner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: questions about disk configurations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 001c01c29fbd$a14e6520$ae977841@istation.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: questions about disk configurations (Hubert depesz Lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.pl>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
I don't know whether you have read this link but it was helpful to me. http://www.ca.postgresql.org/docs/momjian/hw_performance/0.html It discusses PostgreSQL Hardware Performance Tuning. Hope it helps! Keith Bottner -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Hubert depesz Lubaczewski Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 7:05 AM To: Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PERFORM] questions about disk configurations On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:01:58PM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > A bit more data is needed before anybody can give you more help: > - what is your budget? > - how big will your databases be? > - what's the read/write ratio? my question as for now is purely theoretical. i'm not asking about any specific situation, but me may talk about medium sized web size. budget is irrelevant (i'd like to talk *only* about harddrives, not memory, architescure and so on). > - as you correctly said: distribute the load on many spindles. On a > busy database, 4*20G is probably faster than 1*80G as i said: i know that 3 disks are bettar than 1 (as for postgres installation, because system data and swap should be on 4th disc - but this is obvious). > beyound this, experiences vary. RAID1 and RAID5 are rated differently > by different people - and especially with RAID5 there are (I think) > really performance differencies between the various products. RAID0 is > fastest, of course, but you probably care for your data. that's exactly what i'm asking about: which raid is best suited for which data amongst out 3 sets (xlog, tables, indices). or maybe for some types of data single disc is better than raid for some strange reason? is it better to (when having 2 discs) setup raid 0/1 or to use tham separatelly as xlog/tables? depesz -- hubert depesz lubaczewski http://www.depesz.pl/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mój Boże, spraw abym milczał, dopóki się nie upewnię, że naprawdę mam coś do powiedzenia. (c) 1998 depesz ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: