Re: ORDER BY question
От | Luis H. |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ORDER BY question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 001701c370c0$165bc2d0$0301a8c0@bigbertha обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Can Postgresql run in MS Windows (chrizkoh@yahoo.com (Christopher Koh)) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
I looked into the headers, and saw all the thread tracking info. I had no idea this was going on in the background. Sorry for any confusion this might have caused in your mail clients! - Luis ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruno Wolff III" <bruno@wolff.to> To: "Luis H." <pgsql-novice@geekhouse.no-ip.com> Cc: <pgsql-novice@postgresql.org> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 3:09 PM Subject: Re: [NOVICE] ORDER BY question > On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 09:57:04 -0400, > "Luis H." <pgsql-novice@geekhouse.no-ip.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the info! Group by should do the trick. > > > > Why does replying to an unrelated message create an issue, btw? I changed > > the subject, headers and contents of the e-mail. Or at least I thought I > > did! > > Because message threading isn't tracked by subject. There are other > headers that indicate a message is a reply and you didn't change the one > your mail client uses. Doing this hides your message in a thread with > a different topic. > > > Also, why do people reply to both the message sender and the mailing list? > > Doesn't it just arrive duplicated in the sender's mailbox. > > How do we know you are subscribed to the list? > > If you don't want to be copied personally, setting the mail-followup-to > header will do this for many clients. >
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: