Re: Surprise :-(
От | Mihai Gheorghiu |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Surprise :-( |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 001701c25521$109558e0$6e646464@New6.Travel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Surprise :-( ("Mihai Gheorghiu" <tanethq@earthlink.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Surprise :-(
Re: Surprise :-( |
Список | pgsql-general |
explain select account, sum(amount) from tbas_transactions where isposted and trxtype = 'MP' group by account; psql:xx.txt:1: NOTICE: QUERY PLAN: Aggregate (cost=10874.64..10889.76 rows=302 width=24) -> Group (cost=10874.64..10882.20 rows=3025 width=24) -> Sort (cost=10874.64..10874.64 rows=3025 width=24) -> Index Scan using trx_trxtype_idx on tbas_transactions (cost=0.00..10699.78 rows=3025 width=24) EXPLAIN Sorry, I do not have an explain from before vacuum analyze. The table has ~700k rows and indices on account, trxtype and a few other fields used in other queries. -----Original Message----- From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com> To: Mihai Gheorghiu <tanethq@earthlink.net> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> Date: Thursday, September 05, 2002 4:34 PM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Surprise :-( >On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Mihai Gheorghiu wrote: > >> I ran a vacuum analyze on a database. Now the query I ran vacuum analyze for >> takes twice as long, and all the other queries I tested take longer, too. >> Please help. > >What are the queries and explain output for the queries (preferably >including the old state if you have explain from that as well). >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: