Re: Using index with order desc
От | Peter Gibbs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Using index with order desc |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 001701c22d8c$af6b2060$0b01010a@emkel.co.za обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Using index with order desc (Dave Smith <dave.smith@candata.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
"Dave Smith" wrote: > Using pg 7.2.1 > > If I have a simple table transfer > > company_id int, > module character(2) > otherfields ... > > and an index > CREATE INDEX transfer_5 on transfer(company_id,module); > > with the query > > explain select * from transfer where company_id=1012 order by > company_id,module desc; > > I get .. > > NOTICE: QUERY PLAN: > > Sort (cost=462.74..462.74 rows=117 width=176) > -> Index Scan using transfer_5 on transfer (cost=0.00..458.71 > rows=117 width=176) > > > Why does it have to sort it? The desc is at the end and the first > argument is constant. Is there some way I can force postgres to read the > index backwards and save the sort step? > Try: explain select * from transfer where company_id=1012 order by company_id desc, module desc; -- Peter Gibbs EmKel Systems
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: