Re: What is the practical limitation of no multi-threading?
От | Gregory Wood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What is the practical limitation of no multi-threading? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 001501c18198$4a554980$7889ffcc@comstock.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | What is the practical limitation of no multi-threading? (Brian Beuning <bbeuning@mindspring.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> OK I admit it, I am a postgresql newbie. The developers FAQ says the > postgresql "backend" is not multi-threaded. How serious is this? Not serious at all... PostgreSQL is not multi-threaded, but it does take advantage of multiple processes. Each connection spawns a new backend process that run concurrently with other backend processes. > If this means only one transaction at a time can make progress or the > entire DBMS server is blocked on every disk I/O then that is very bad. One transaction per connection. But you can have quite a large number of connections, each with their own process. > But if every connection gets its own backend, and the backends can run > in parallel then not being multithreaded is no big deal. Exactly. > Here is the bottom line. Our app runs on multiple machines (we call > them sinks) hitting one DBMS server for data. We expect the sinks to > be able to all make progress at the same time. Each sink fetchs > some data, goes compute bound for .2 to .4 seconds, and then > sends a bunch of INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE to the DBMS. > Will our sinks be able to run concurrently? Yes, breathe easy :) Greg
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: