Re: pg_dumpall and check constraints
От | Stephan Szabo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dumpall and check constraints |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 001501bfe301$c5e847f0$0c64010a@kick.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dumpall and check constraints (Guillaume Perréal <perreal@lyon.cemagref.fr>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> > How should a RESTRICT or ON > > DELETE CASCADE work in that scenario? > > Perhaps as Check constraints on all tables in the view...for the most part > I would not expect complex views to be used in this way, but since this is > what the user would have to do anyway, why not do it for them? I'd say that for right now, way to complicated... Any non-trivial view would be an incredible pain. Although, once we properly insist on there being a unique constraint on the columns referenced, it would probably be easier (although can you actually put a unique constraint on a view?) Take, for example, create view x as select a.id, c.name from a,b,c where a.id=b.id and a.type=c.type and b.customerid=c.id and c.name < 'Smith'; So, what it the deletion constraint on table c? It's something like, you can't delete a row in c that has a name < 'Smith' and who matches up with an a,b row based on the other constraints and has a referencing row in the table you made the reference from, but I'm not even 100% sure of that. And heaven help you if there are subqueries. And of course, the cascade, set null and set default are even stranger.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: