RE: Vacuum/mdtruncate() (was: RE: [HACKERS] Current TODO list)
От | Hiroshi Inoue |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Vacuum/mdtruncate() (was: RE: [HACKERS] Current TODO list) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 001301bea5ca$eb21f2c0$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Vacuum/mdtruncate() (was: RE: [HACKERS] Current TODO list) (Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>) |
Ответы |
RE: Vacuum/mdtruncate() (was: RE: [HACKERS] Current TODO list)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: root@sunpine.krs.ru [mailto:root@sunpine.krs.ru]On Behalf Of Vadim > Mikheev > Sent: Monday, May 24, 1999 4:53 PM > To: Ole Gjerde > Cc: Hiroshi Inoue; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development > Subject: Re: Vacuum/mdtruncate() (was: RE: [HACKERS] Current TODO list) > > > Ole Gjerde wrote: > > > > While doing a bunch of vacuums, I have seen some strange things(so my > > patch probably isn't 100%). > > I started with 58 segments, and did a bunch of delete/vacuums and got it Are delete/vacuums executed sequentially by single session ? > > down to about 5-6. Then I got the error below while running a vacuum > > analyze. This appeared after the index clean, but before any > tuples were > > moved. > > ERROR: HEAP_MOVED_IN was not expected > > I added this in my last patch ... I have to think more about > the cause. > > > Also, I was seeing some more errors about INDEX' TUPLES being > higher than > > HEAP TUPLES. Didn't this just get fixed, or did I break > something with my > > patch. I was seeing these after doing delete/vacuums with my patch. > > Hiroshi, could you try to reproduce NOT THE SAME problem > with new vacuum code? > I couldn't reproduce NOT THE SAME message in current. Thanks. Hiroshi Inoue Inoue@tpf.co.jp
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: