Re: Why vacuum?
От | Martin A. Marques |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why vacuum? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 00121409015900.02491@math.unl.edu.ar обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why vacuum? ("xuyifeng" <xyf@stocke.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
El Mié 13 Dic 2000 22:24, xuyifeng escribió: > I have this nasty problem too, in early time, I don't know the problem, > but we used it for a while, than we found our table growing too fast > without insert any record( we use update), this behaviour most like M$ > MSACCESS database I had used a long time ago which don't reuse deleted > record space and full fill your hard disk after several hours, the nasty > vaccum block any other users to operate on table, this is a big problem > for a large table, because it will block tooo long to let other user to run > query. we have a project affected by this problem, and sadly we decide to > use closure source database - SYBASE on linux, we havn't any other > selections. :( > > note that SYBASE and Informix both have 'update statistics' command, but > they run it fast in seconds, not block any other user, this is pretty. ya, > what's good technology! I have to say that 'update statistics' does not take a few seconds if the databases have grownto be a bit large. At least thats what I have seen. Saludos... :-) -- System Administration: It's a dirty job, but someone told I had to do it. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Martín Marqués email: martin@math.unl.edu.ar Santa Fe - Argentina http://math.unl.edu.ar/~martin/ Administrador de sistemas en math.unl.edu.ar -----------------------------------------------------------------
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: