Re: Autovacuum on by default?
От | Larry Rosenman |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Autovacuum on by default? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 001201c6c222$7d33c820$0202fea9@aus.pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Autovacuum on by default? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Autovacuum on by default?
Re: Autovacuum on by default? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: >>> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>>> Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: >>>> >>>>> and increasing the log level when autovacuum actually fires off a >>>>> VACUUM or ANALYZE command. >>>>> >>>> >>>> This was not done because the logging control only for autovacuum >>>> was going to be added. Right now, if you want to see the vacuum >>>> activity, you end up seeing debug stuff too (very ugly). >>> >>> Any chance we can make this change before release? I think it's >>> very important to be able to look through the logs and *know* that >>> you tables are getting vacuumed or not. >> >> Agreed. I just IM'ed Alvaro and he says pg_stat_activity should now >> show exactly what autovacuum is doing (and if it doesn't, let's fix >> it). I think that is the best solution to the monitoring problem, >> rather than throwing lines in the server logs. > > Well, the problem is that it shows what it's *currently* doing, but it > doesn't let you know what has happened in the last day or whatever. > It can't answer "has table foo been vacuumed recently?" or "what > tables haven't been vacuumed at all during this week?" I added last vacuum and last analyze (both auto and manual) dates in the 8.2 tree..... -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: