Re: Small fix for inv_getsize
От | Denis Perchine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Small fix for inv_getsize |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 00110223590400.00541@dyp.perchine.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Small fix for inv_getsize (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Small fix for inv_getsize
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
> > OK. I see... I just wondering whether it is possible to use index to get > > the maximum... > > I think you are right, it's possible to do it that way. The original > code was broken because it didn't check tuple visibility, so I just > copied-and-pasted some other code without thinking very hard. Feel > free to improve it. Sorry, but I did not find any significant difference between my code and code you wrote. Except VARATT_IS_EXTENDED check (is it neccessary, can I store data and be sure that it is not toasted? I do not like this for BLOBs). All other seems the same... Please give me an example of this check... -- Sincerely Yours, Denis Perchine ---------------------------------- E-Mail: dyp@perchine.com HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/ FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5 ----------------------------------
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: