RE: [GENERAL] TODO list elements
От | Hiroshi Inoue |
---|---|
Тема | RE: [GENERAL] TODO list elements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 001101be2704$38197ee0$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] TODO list elements (Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org > [mailto:owner-pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org]On Behalf Of Vadim Mikheev > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 1998 6:05 PM > To: dustin sallings > Cc: The Hermit Hacker; Kaare Rasmussen; pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] TODO list elements > > > dustin sallings wrote: > > > > On Thu, 10 Dec 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > > // Vadim has already starting throwing in code for this...his plan > > // is for v6.5 release (~3months) for this to be in place... > > > > Interesting...will this help out vacuuming any? > > No. Vacuum will still exclusively lock relation. But > I'll fix vacuum to unlock pg_class (when vacuuming all tables > in database). > > And note - this will be not row level locking, but > multi-version concurrency control. > What does it mean ? LLL in 6.5 doesn't include row level locking ? Thanks. Hiroshi Inoue Inoue@tpf.co.jp
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: