Re: PostgreSQL for NT
От | W. van den Akker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL for NT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 001001c051b7$08f0fcd0$0500020a@wilsoft.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL for NT ("W. van den Akker" <wvdakker@wilsoft.nl>) |
Список | pgsql-ports |
Jason, I've tried to copy the postgres.exe to postmaster.exe. After running postmaster.exe I get the following message: FindExec: could not find a postmaster to execute... postmaster: could not find postmaster to execute... Any ideas? gr, Willem ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Tishler" <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com> To: "W. van den Akker" <wvdakker@wilsoft.nl> Cc: <pgsql-ports@postgresql.org> Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2000 9:04 PM Subject: Re: [PORTS] PostgreSQL for NT > Willem, > > On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 11:31:12AM +0100, W. van den Akker wrote: > > Do I have to run Postgres from the Bash-shell? > > Since in the standard distribution postmaster is a symlink to postgres, > I guess that the answer is "yes." There are other games that you could > play, but... > > > I like to run postgres as a service within NT. > > Since you want to run PostgreSQL as a NT service, the simplest solution > is to delete the symlink from postmaster to postgres.exe and copy > postgres.exe to postmaster.exe. After performing these operations, > PostgreSQL will be able to run from cmd, as an NT service (if wrapped > by something like srvany or invoker), and from bash. The only downside > is a little wasted disk space, but disk space is cheap and getting > cheaper... > > I was actually thinking that may be the standard NT distribution should not > contain symlinks for this exact reason. What do others think? > > Thanks, > Jason > > -- > Jason Tishler > Director, Software Engineering Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235 > Dot Hill Systems Corporation Fax: +1 (732) 264-8798 > 82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason.Tishler@dothill.com > Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com > >
В списке pgsql-ports по дате отправления: