RE: AW: more corruption
От | Hiroshi Inoue |
---|---|
Тема | RE: AW: more corruption |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 000d01bfeaca$784144e0$2801007e@tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: AW: more corruption (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
RE: AW: more corruption
Re: AW: more corruption |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org]On > Behalf Of Tom Lane > > Tim Perdue <tperdue@valinux.com> writes: > >>>>>> -now hopefully I can create my indexes and be back in business > > > I vacuumed here and it worked. I did not use my "old" pg_log file - what > > did I lose? > > Hard to tell. Any tuples that weren't already marked on disk as "known > committed" have probably gone missing, because their originating > transaction IDs likely won't be shown as committed in the new pg_log. > So I'd look for missing tuples from recent transactions in the old DB. > Hmm,this may be more serious. MVCC doesn't see committed(marked HEAP_XMIN_COMMITTED) but not yet committed(t_xmin > CurrentTransactionId) tuples. He will see them in the future. Regards. Hiroshi Inoue Inoue@tpf.co.jp
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: