Re: [HACKERS] CORBA interface in backend?
От | Jeff Hoffmann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] CORBA interface in backend? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 000d01be0db3$ef505940$c525c4ce@remapcorp.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, Michael Meskes wrote: > >> This is where it gets tricky. Which existing ORB are you thinking about? I >> know of only two free ORBs: The Gnome one (orbit) and mico. Orbit is GPLed >> so there's a problem with PostgreSQL becoming GPLed. However, as long as >> PostgreSQL remain free under the BSD license that should be okay. But we >> defintely lose the possibility to make this a commercial product. Not that >> we want to do so. > there's also omniORB (http://www.orl.co.uk) which i found when i was looking for vnc. haven't used it, don't know much about it, but i believe it's also LGPL'd (maybe GPL'd) > Both are GPLd then, as I'm doing work with MICO and FreeBSD, and >just checked their license files. > > Now, here is where *I* get confused. MICO uses LGPL for its >libraries, so does this mean that the ORB hooks could be added where >applicable, still under the BSD license, but in order to compile it in, >mico's libraries would have to be installed first? Its something we >check for/do with the tcl stuff... > > So, could the ORB hooks be added with a config option of >'--enable-orb' *without* the requirement for adding in any GPLd code? an abstract orb interface? sounds good as long as someone else is doing the work.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: