RE: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert
От | Hiroshi Inoue |
---|---|
Тема | RE: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 000c01bf3638$d24ea0a0$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > > > Good point, but (AFAIK) you could only use it for tables > that you were > > > > sure no other client was updating in parallel. Otherwise > you might be > > > > updating a just-obsoleted tuple. Or is there a solution for that? > > > > > > > > > Is someone still working on the xid access ? > > > > > > > > I think we have the ability to refer to CTID in WHERE now, > but not yet an > > > > access method that actually makes it fast... > > > > > > Hiroshi supplied a patch to allow it in the executor, and I > applied it. > > > > > > > Bruce,could you apply my attached patch ? > > I have to add 3 new files but couldn't do 'cvs add' > > the files on my machine. > > Am I mistaken ? > > I couldn't understand the reason now. > > Applied. No idea why the add didn't work there. It worked here. > Thanks a lot. I don't know CVS well. Could someone teach me ? It seems that 'cvs add' on my current machine connects to postgresql.org. Is it right ? Isn't 'cvs add' local ? Regards. Hiroshi Inoue Inoue@tpf.co.jp
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: