RE: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates
От | Hiroshi Inoue |
---|---|
Тема | RE: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 000b01bf63b1$093cbd40$2801007e@tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Some notes on optimizer cost estimates (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org > [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org]On Behalf Of Tom Lane > > I have been spending some time measuring actual runtimes for various > sequential-scan and index-scan query plans, and have learned that the > current Postgres optimizer's cost estimation equations are not very > close to reality at all. > Thanks for your good analysis. I also have said current cost estimation for index-scan is too low. But I have had no concrete numerical values. I've wondered why we cound't analyze database without vacuum. We couldn't run vacuum light-heartedly because it acquires an exclusive lock for the target table. In addition,vacuum error occurs with analyze option in most cases AFAIK. Regards. Hiroshi Inoue Inoue@tpf.co.jp
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: