Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3
От | Keith Bottner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 000a01c2f88f$5e288200$ae977841@istation.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3 (Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
FYI, I believe that XFS will be included in the 2.6 kernel. Keith Bottner kbottner@istation.com -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 11:55 AM To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PERFORM] ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3 On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 12:33:15PM -0500, Jeffrey D. Brower wrote: > What is the URL of that article? I understood that ext2 was faster > with PG and so I went to a lot of trouble of creating an ext2 > partition just for PG and gave up the journalling to do that. > Something about double effort since PG already does a lot of that. I don't know how ext3 could be faster than ext2, since it has to do more work. But ext2 is not crash-safe. So your data could well be hosed if you come back from a crash on ext2. Actually, I have my doubts about _any_ of the journaling filesystems for Linux: ext3 has a reputation for being slow if you journal in the real-safe mode, and there have been so many unrepeatable reiserfs problem reports that I'm loathe to use it for real systems. I had exceptionally good experiences with xfs when I was admining SGI boxes, but that's not part of the standard Linux kernel distribution, and with no idea why, I think my managers would get grumpy with me for using it. A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada <andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8 +1 416 646 3304 x110 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: