Re: Use of term hostaddrs for multiple hostaddr values
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Use of term hostaddrs for multiple hostaddr values |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 00089180-a006-c4b5-ee99-b766d13df14a@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Use of term hostaddrs for multiple hostaddr values (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Use of term hostaddrs for multiple hostaddr values
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/20/18 17:39, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 08:30:43PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 5:34 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> These are both clear bugs, and the docs one should definitely be both >> applied and backpatched. >> >> How much do we care about the error message when it comes to backpatching? >> Maybe we should leave that one to 11 only, to avoid breaking that, as the >> way it's written it's actually less wrong there. >> >> Thoughts? > > Thanks for your input! > > Applying the error message portion only on HEAD is a good plan, there is > no point to make the life of translaters unnecessary painful. I would backpatch both. The updated error message is arguably easier to translate. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: