Re: Code of Conduct

Geoff,

> If there were a CoC that would explicitly disallow occasional lighthearted humour to a non-development list that is
intendedto offend no-one then I would most definitely remove myself from such a project.  

> Some may consider that a positive thing, but I would like to think that in the main I have at least tried to help in
thesmall ways that I could. 

> Your post, on the other hand, is clearly intended to censure a fellow contributor to the list, which I find far more
offensive.I guess that's the problem with CoCs, because to some people what's reasonable behaviour is utterly
unacceptableto others. 

>  For what it's worth, I would consider my post to be no less on topic for postgres-general than the original topic.
Evennotwithstanding that I think it would be a complete waste of time and resources I don't consider this the correct
placeto hold such a conversation: 
> there is a -docs list, after all. But since I'm able to simply ignore and delete those posts that don't interest me,
Ididn't really see any point in saying anything. 

> Geoff

The Coc allows light-hearted humor,  I'm so disappointed you didn't get my clever punning in my last email.  I thought
itwas a treasure. 

Now while what you said is fine for this list, it's questionable it adds value to this discussion.

On further observation, I realize it can be used as a testcase to test the strength of this Coc.  So I stand corrected
thisis quite relevant and useful to this discussion.  In fact, I think we should package all these and use them in
regressiontests for this Coc. 

Thanks,
Regina