LabView and PostgreSQL ; and RecordSet GetString performance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Silvio Macedo
Тема LabView and PostgreSQL ; and RecordSet GetString performance
Дата
Msg-id 000401c5a929$6c0cf930$0302a8c0@plexus
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: LabView and PostgreSQL ; and RecordSet GetString performance
Список pgsql-interfaces
Hi,

A week or two ago, Fisher Ulrich asked this list about interfaces from
LabView to PostgreSQL. (hope he's reading as I couldn't find his
original email in the list archive).

For LabView on Windows, you can use LabSQL, which is a simple, but
convenient, ADO wrapper to Postgres. You then can use native OLEDB
(undergoing development) or PostgreSQL OLE/ODBC driver.
LabSQL - google search it
OLEDB and ODBC come with standard dist (windows, of course)

To save you time, DSN-less connection strings are as follows:
For ODBC:
DRIVER={PostgreSQL};SERVER=127.0.0.1;port=5432;DATABASE=IT2CalMeter200
5;UID=IT2CalMeter;PWD=xxxxx;

For OLEDB:
Provider=PostgreSQL; Location=IT2CalMeter2005; User ID=IT2CalMeter;
Password=xxxxx;

change db, user and pass as needed, obviously.


Now, I'm having two issues with these:
- in native OLEDB, if an error happens when executing an SQL
statement, I cannot close the connection (ADO Connection.Close won't
actually close it) and the backend will start to have lots of zombie
connections (well, Idle at least).

- on the other hand, in OLE/ODBC, RecordSet.GetString is about 10
times slower than native OLEDB to get 20K records (tstamp,value).

Anybody had this sort of performance hit on GetString on PostgreSQL
ODBC?
Any tips? Any special connection string tuning?
Would GetRows be much better?

Thanks a lot
Silvio



В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Scott Cain
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: DBD::Pg and "invalid frontend message type 10"
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: LabView and PostgreSQL ; and RecordSet GetString performance