RE: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage?
От | Hiroshi Inoue |
---|---|
Тема | RE: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 000401bef41a$71da1fc0$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? (Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: root@sunpine.krs.ru [mailto:root@sunpine.krs.ru]On Behalf Of Vadim > Mikheev > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 1999 1:18 AM > To: Tom Lane > Cc: Cyrus Rahman; Inoue@tpf.co.jp; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > > Interestingly, this isn't a big problem on platforms where there is > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > a relatively low limit on number of open files per process. A backend > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > will run its open file count up to the limit and then stay there It's not a small problem on platforms such as cygwin, OS2 where we couldn't unlink open files. We have to close useless file descriptors ASAP there. 6.5.2-release should be stable as possible. So I don't object to the riskless way as Vadim mentioned. Regards. Hiroshi Inoue Inoue@tpf.co.jp
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: