Re: postgres_fdw binary protocol support
От | Ilya Gladyshev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres_fdw binary protocol support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0002B5B0-E328-4CEC-BE5F-89D711B6AF40@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgres_fdw binary protocol support (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> 22 нояб. 2022 г., в 17:10, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> написал(а): > > Hi Illya, > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 8:50 PM Ilya Gladyshev > <ilya.v.gladyshev@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> I have made a patch that introduces support for libpq binary protocol >> in postgres_fdw. The idea is simple, when a user knows that the foreign >> server is binary compatible with the local and his workload could >> somehow benefit from using binary protocol, it can be switched on for a >> particular server or even a particular table. >> > > Why do we need this feature? If it's for performance then do we have > performance numbers? Yes, it is for performance, but I am yet to do the benchmarks. My initial idea was that binary protocol must be more efficientthan text, because as I understand that’s the whole point of it. However, the minor tests that I have done do notprove this and I couldn’t find any benchmarks for it online, so I will do further tests to find a use case for it. > About the patch itself, I see a lot of if (binary) {} else {} block > which are repeated. It will be good if we can add functions/macros to > avoid duplication. Yea, that’s true, I have some ideas about improving it
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: