RE: [HACKERS] Frustration
От | Hiroshi Inoue |
---|---|
Тема | RE: [HACKERS] Frustration |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 000101bf094a$58ecb140$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Frustration (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] > Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 10:20 PM > To: Hiroshi Inoue > Cc: Michael Simms; pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Frustration > > > "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes: > > Different from other spinlocks,io_in_progress spinlock is a per bufpage > > spinlock and ProcReleaseSpins() doesn't release the spinlock. > > If an error(in md.c in most cases) occured while holding the spinlock > > ,the spinlock would necessarily freeze. > > Oooh, good point. Shouldn't this be fixed? If we don't fix it, then Yes,it's on TODO. * spinlock stuck problem when elog(FATAL) and elog(ERROR) inside bufmgr I would try to fix it. > a disk I/O error will translate to an installation-wide shutdown and > restart as soon as some backend tries to touch the locked page (as > indeed was happening to Michael). That seems a tad extreme. > Regards. Hiroshi Inoue Inoue@tpf.co.jp
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: