RE: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach?
| От | Hiroshi Inoue |
|---|---|
| Тема | RE: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 000001bf0331$4211b200$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? (Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org > [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org]On Behalf Of Vadim Mikheev > Sent: Monday, September 20, 1999 2:34 PM > To: Bruce Momjian > Cc: PostgreSQL Developers List > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > Or shmem inheritance is not portable? > > > > If it works on your machine with it removed, commit the change and I can > > test it here. I don't know of any portability problems with shared > > memory children. > > I wrote simple test program and it works under FreeBSD and Solaris > (on Ultra). Currently I'm not able to do more. Actually, I worry > does this work under MS Windows. > Where do we attach to shmem after fork() ? I couldn't find the place. Regards. Hiroshi Inoue Inoue@tpf.co.jp
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: