Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Fabien COELHO
Тема
Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks
Дата
Msg-id
alpine.DEB.2.21.1810221003590.3819@lancre
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

Hello Michaël,

> The first failure is unrelated to the involved commits, as they touched
> completely different areas of the code:
>  INSERT INTO hash_split_heap SELECT a/2 FROM generate_series(1, 25000) a;
> + WARNING:  buffer refcount leak: [6481] (rel=base/16384/32349, blockNum=156, flags=0x93800000, refcount=1 1)
>
> And versions older than HEAD do not complain.
>
> Any thoughts?

Both animals use gcc experimental versions, which may rather underline a 
new bug in gcc head rather than an existing issue in pg. Or not.

-- 
Fabien.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Haribabu Kommi
Дата:
От: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Дата:
FAQ