Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring
| От | Chris Travers |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAN-RpxBN1KbfFrm3Wp3QZw5LwuVFVT3_5TKo+EuPnK7BQejUGQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 7:08 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
Hi,
On 2018-10-09 16:04:35 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> More generally, I'd like this material to be code comments. It's the
> kind of stuff that gets outdated before long if it's kept separate.
I'm not sure I buy this here - we don't have (but perhaps should?) a
convenient location for an overview comment around this. There's no
"signal_handling.c" where it'd clearly belong - given the lack of a
clear point to look to, I don't think a README.SIGNAL_HANDLING would get
out-of-date more quickly than code comments in mildly related place (say
postgres.c or miscinit.c) would get out of date at a different pace.
The other point is that "This is the way to do it" is a little easier when in a README rather than in code comments sine those might be scattered in a bunch of different places.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
Best Regards,
Chris Travers
Head of Database
Saarbrücker Straße 37a, 10405 Berlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: