Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux)
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux)
Дата
Msg-id
992905.1605721547@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux) (Christophe Pettus)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux) Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux) "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux) Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux) Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>
Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux) Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux) Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux) Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>
Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux) Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux) Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux) Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux) Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux) Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux) Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux) Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux) Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux) Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Christophe Pettus writes: >> On Nov 18, 2020, at 09:28, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> Their only chance is to search for >> something else that might hit our docs, then in that click over to the >> correct version they actually asked for, and then search *again* using >> our site-search and hope that it shows up there. I'm willing to bet >> very few users will figure that part out... > I'm not sure that is a worse situation than searching for something and having the first page be 9.1 hits. Maybe, rather than trying to force google to index "current", we should force them to index current minus one or two releases, so that what they index is in the middle of the range of supported releases. That would represent a decent compromise between "info too old" and "info too new". Another idea is to block, via robots.txt, any out-of-support branches. We won't know which of the supported branches they then prioritize, but at least it won't be 9.1. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления