Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size
Дата
Msg-id
587321.1677178616@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Corey Huinker  writes:
> My not-ready-for-16 work on CAST( ... ON DEFAULT ... ) involved making
> FuncExpr/IoCoerceExpr/ArrayCoerceExpr have a safe_mode flag, and that
> necessitates adding a reserror boolean to ExprEvalStep for subsequent steps
> to test if the error happened.

Why do you want it in ExprEvalStep ... couldn't it be in ExprState?
I can't see why you'd need more than one at a time during evaluation.

			regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Kirk Wolak
Дата:
От: Kirk Wolak
Дата:
FAQ