Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size
Дата
Msg-id 587321.1677178616@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size  (Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com> writes:
> My not-ready-for-16 work on CAST( ... ON DEFAULT ... ) involved making
> FuncExpr/IoCoerceExpr/ArrayCoerceExpr have a safe_mode flag, and that
> necessitates adding a reserror boolean to ExprEvalStep for subsequent steps
> to test if the error happened.

Why do you want it in ExprEvalStep ... couldn't it be in ExprState?
I can't see why you'd need more than one at a time during evaluation.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kirk Wolak
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposal: %T Prompt parameter for psql for current time (like Oracle has)
Следующее
От: Kirk Wolak
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposal: %T Prompt parameter for psql for current time (like Oracle has)