Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size
Дата
Msg-id
587321.1677178616@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Corey Huinker writes: > My not-ready-for-16 work on CAST( ... ON DEFAULT ... ) involved making > FuncExpr/IoCoerceExpr/ArrayCoerceExpr have a safe_mode flag, and that > necessitates adding a reserror boolean to ExprEvalStep for subsequent steps > to test if the error happened. Why do you want it in ExprEvalStep ... couldn't it be in ExprState? I can't see why you'd need more than one at a time during evaluation. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Kirk Wolak
Дата:
От: Kirk Wolak
Дата: