RE: Re: Strangeness in xid allocation / snapshot setup
От
Mikheev, Vadim
Тема
RE: Re: Strangeness in xid allocation / snapshot setup
Дата
Msg-id
3705826352029646A3E91C53F7189E320166C9@sectorbase2.sectorbase.com
Список
Дерево обсуждения
RE: Re: Strangeness in xid allocation / snapshot setup "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>
> >> Given this, I'm wondering why we bother with having a separate > >> XidGenLock spinlock at all. Why not eliminate it and use SInval > >> spinlock to lock GetNewTransactionId and ReadNewTransactionId? > > > Reading all MyProc in GetSnashot may take long time - why disallow > > new Tx to begin. > > Because we need to synchronize? It bothers me that we're assuming > that fetching/storing XIDs is atomic. There's no possibility at all > of going to 8-byte XIDs as long as the code is like this. > > I doubt that a spinlock per PROC structure would be a better answer, > either; the overhead of getting and releasing each lock would be > nontrivial, considering the small number of instructions spent at > each PROC in these routines. Isn't spinlock just a few ASM instructions?... on most platforms... Vadim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления