Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23)
Дата
Msg-id
3198438.1731895163@sss.pgh.pa.us
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23) Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23) Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23) Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23) Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Thomas Munro  writes:
> I found a few lines we could just delete in master.  I wonder if we
> should also just require sizeof(bool) == 1 more explicitly going
> forward with an error, since we don't have coverage or any expectation
> of ever getting any for the alternative code AFAICS, even if it is
> small.

Yeah, that's a fair criticism.  I don't think we've tested that code
path since I retired prairiedog, so who's to say that it works even
now?  Maybe it's best to just delete that code, and if we ever find a
new platform with wider bool, figure out what to do at that time.

			regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
От: Denis Feklushkin
Дата:
FAQ