Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be
От
Merlin Moncure
Тема
Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be
Дата
Msg-id
303E00EBDD07B943924382E153890E5434AA7A@cuthbert.rcsinc.local
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be "Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>
Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Magnus Hagander wrote: > I guess I've spent too much time listening to people, including myself, > assuming how things work without actually testing it. > > It turns out that both select() and recv() (and thus, probably send() as > well) put the thread in alertable state. This means that while we are in > a blocking select() or recv(), *our signals will be delivered using an > APC*. Ha! That makes things easy then, doesn't it! As for the polling, adding a poll to one or two strategic plaes (like the I/O subsystem) should cover 99% of the reasonable cases... Merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления