Re: lack of consequence with domains and types
От
Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Тема
Re: lack of consequence with domains and types
Дата
Msg-id
2f4958ff0812221308o695d10bj2ab25fb0e6c4cf12@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: lack of consequence with domains and types (Erik Jones)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
lack of consequence with domains and types "Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz" <gryzman@gmail.com>
Re: lack of consequence with domains and types "Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz" <gryzman@gmail.com>
Re: lack of consequence with domains and types Erik Jones <ejones@engineyard.com>
Re: lack of consequence with domains and types "Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz" <gryzman@gmail.com>
Re: lack of consequence with domains and types Erik Jones <ejones@engineyard.com>
Re: lack of consequence with domains and types "Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz" <gryzman@gmail.com>
Re: lack of consequence with domains and types Erik Jones <ejones@engineyard.com>
Re: lack of consequence with domains and types "Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz" <gryzman@gmail.com>
Re: lack of consequence with domains and types "Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz" <gryzman@gmail.com>
Re: lack of consequence with domains and types "Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz" <gryzman@gmail.com>
Re: lack of consequence with domains and types "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: lack of consequence with domains and types "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Erik Jones wrote: > As mentioned above, by "fixing" the behavior to be what you're expecting > you'd be breaking the defined behavior of ALTER TABLE. I don't understand. The domain's have default values, how will it break alter table ? Please explain. -- GJ
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
