Re: Inconsistent usage of BACKEND_* symbols

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 04:39:59PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> @@ -2740,8 +2740,8 @@ pmdie(SIGNAL_ARGS)
>          {
>              /* autovac workers are told to shut down immediately */
>              /* and bgworkers too; does this need tweaking? */
> -            SignalSomeChildren(SIGTERM,
> -                               BACKEND_TYPE_AUTOVAC | BACKEND_TYPE_BGWORKER);
> +            SignalSomeChildren(SIGTERM, BACKEND_TYPE_WORKER);
> +

For this one the comment would be inconsistent with the flags listed.

>              /* and the autovac launcher too */
>              if (AutoVacPID != 0)
>                  signal_child(AutoVacPID, SIGTERM);
> @@ -2821,8 +2821,7 @@ pmdie(SIGNAL_ARGS)
>                      (errmsg("aborting any active transactions")));
>              /* shut down all backends and workers */
>              SignalSomeChildren(SIGTERM,
> -                               BACKEND_TYPE_NORMAL | BACKEND_TYPE_AUTOVAC |
> -                               BACKEND_TYPE_BGWORKER);
> +                               BACKEND_TYPE_NORMAL | BACKEND_TYPE_WORKER);

Okay for this one.
--
Michael