Re: [PATCH] Log details for client certificate failures

Jacob Champion  writes:
> I'm currently hardcoding an elevel of ERROR on the new guc_strdup()s,
> because that seems to be a common case for the check hooks.

Really?  That's almost certainly NOT okay.  As an example, if you
have a problem with a new value loaded from postgresql.conf during
SIGHUP processing, throwing ERROR will cause the postmaster to exit.

I wouldn't be too surprised if there are isolated cases where people
didn't understand what they were doing and wrote that, but that
needs to be fixed not emulated.

			regards, tom lane